نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد علوم تربیتی برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی کارشناسی رشته روانشناسی، مرکز دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی سلسله (شهر الشتر)، زیرمجموعه واحد خرمآباد، استان لرستان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Background and Objectives: Although teacher education policymaking in Iran spans over a century, it faces persistent challenges like qualified human resource shortages, theory-practice gaps, and policy instability. While existing literature evaluates policy outcomes, a deep gap exists in analyzing the decision-making patterns that formulate these policies. This article critically analyzes the decision-making patterns governing Iran's teacher education and identifies their strengths and limitations. Methods: This qualitative study employs a systematic review and critical analysis of upstream policy documents, parliamentary legislation, policy center reports, and relevant academic studies. The theoretical framework utilizes classical and contemporary public policy decision-making approaches. Findings: Decision processes in this area have primarily followed centralized "rational-bureaucratic" and "political-coalitional" patterns. These patterns contributed to policy discontinuity, limited research evidence utilization, tokenistic involvement of key stakeholders (particularly teachers), and the dominance of short-term, crisis-driven approaches over strategic planning. Conclusion: The study highlights the necessity of a paradigm shift toward a more integrative and participatory policymaking approach, grounded in network governance principles, to overcome current structural challenges.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)