Quality Assessment of the Revised Curriculum of Educational Sciences (Primary Education) of Farhangian University (Case Study: Kermanshah Province)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

farhangian univercity

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the curriculum of primary education in Farhangian University. The research is quantitative and has been done by descriptive survey method. The study population was first and second year students of primary education in the academic year 1401-1400, which had a population of 300 people, and according to Morgan's table, 170 of them were selected as the sample size. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. Content and face validity were used to assess the validity of the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.94. The results of the present study according to the elements of the curriculum are as follows: The objectives and content of the curriculum have to some extent been able to meet the needs and expectations of students. However, in relation to teaching and evaluation strategies, the results showed that these strategies failed to meet the needs and expectations of students.

Keywords

References

وزارت آموزش‌وپرورش. (1393). اساسنامه دانشگاه فرهنگیان. دانشگاه فرهنگیان.
سرمد، ز؛ بازرگان، ع؛ و حجازی، ا. (1394). روش­های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. انتشارات آگه.
عارفی، م. (1384). ارزیابی برنامه درسی رشته علوم تربیتی (گرایش مدیریت آموزشی) در آموزش عالی ایران از دیدگاه دانشجویان. متخصصان و کارفرمایان. فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی، 1(1)، 75-43.
فتحی واجارگاه، ک؛ و شفیعی، ن. (1386). ارزشیابی کیفیت برنامه درسی دانشگاهی (آموزش بزرگسالان). فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی، 2(5)، 27-1.
صادق‌زاده قمصری، ع؛ و حسنی، م. (1396). تبیینی از فلسفه تربیت در جمهوری اسلامی ایران. انتشارات شورای‌عالی آموزش‌وپرورش.
قادری، ح؛ و شکاری، ع. (1393). ارزیابی کیفیت برنامه درسی گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه کاشان. فصلنامه پژوهشی برنامه درسی خوراسگان، 11(12) (2). 167-132.
شکور زاده، ر؛ ملکی، ح؛ و قصابی، م. (1393). کیفیت‌سنجی برنامه‌های درسی تحصیلات تکمیلی  گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، 10(34).67-100.
نیکخواه، م؛ و لیاقتدار، م. (1397). بررسی کیفیت اجرای برنامه درسی جدید آموزش ابتدایی دانشگاه فرهنگیان. دوفصلنامه پژوهش در تربیت‌معلم، 1(3)، 130-106.
Bandyopadhyay, K & Lichtman, R. (2007). Six Sigma Approach to Quality and Productivity Improvement in an Institution. International Journal of Management, 24, 4, 802-807.
Posner, G, J. (2014). Analyzing the curriculum, New York. MC.
Sameer, V. (2016). Does the accreditation process affect program quality? A qualitative study of the higher education accountability system on learning. ProQuest Information and learning Company, 253.
Saunders, Sh. T. (2017). Perceptions of quality in cross – border higher education at sojourner–Douglass Bahamas Campus. Morgan state university. ProQuest Information and learning Company, 221.
Wiles, J; Bondi, J . (2012). Curriculum Development; A Guide to practice. New Jersey, Merrill and prentice hall, 6thed.
Parke, J & Harris, M. B. (2016). The purpose of a syllabus. College Teaching, 50, 55-62.
Hardman. F.  Hardman & J, Dochi, H. Ihebuzor, N.(2015). Implementing   school based teacher  development  in tanzania  professional- development in Education, 41(4).623-603.
Research in Teacher Education(RTE)
Volume 5, Issue 2
February 2023
Pages 87-61

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 January 2022
  • Revise Date: 24 December 2022
  • Accept Date: 29 January 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics